Further details on how these metrics are measured and collected is available in the project’s working paper. OxCGRT collects publicly available information on 17 indicators of government responses, spanning containment and closure policies (such as such as school closures and restrictions in movement) economic policies and health system policies (such as testing regimes). The tracker presents data collected from public sources by a team of over one hundred Oxford University students and staff from every part of the world. This resource is published by researchers at the Blavatnik School of Government at the University of Oxford: Thomas Hale, Anna Petherik, Beatriz Kira, Noam Angrist, Toby Phillips and Samuel Webster. The research we provide on policy responses is sourced from the Oxford Coronavirus Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT). In this article, we present data and research from the Coronavirus Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT), published and managed by researchers at the Blavatnik School of Government at the University of Oxford. To understand which policies might be effective in controlling the outbreak – especially as countries move towards easing restrictions – it’s essential that we have a good dataset on the timing and stringency of responses across the world. Differences in governmental policy responses may explain some differences. There are many reasons why some countries might have been worse-hit than others. The Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT) plans to stop updating its global database on policy responses to COVID-19 at the end of 2022ĬOVID-19 is a disease that has affected most, if not all, countries in the world.īut, the magnitude of these impacts has varied a lot between countries – some have been very successful in limiting the spread of the disease, and in preventing deaths.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |